- The Observer,
- Sunday November 30, 2003
The latest row forms part of a pattern of controversial rhetoric by a Home Secretary who has trouble reconciling his more liberal initiatives with his taste for posturing. Even Michael Howard, an abrasive Home Secretary in his time, declared himself shocked at Mr Blunkett's threat, revealed by The Observer last week, to take the children of some failed asylum-seekers into care. While the latest Asylum Bill dare not enshrine this measure, it does propose such a radical cut in the legal aid that reputable firms may withdraw from defending refugees in fear of their lives. Just as asylum applications fall by half, so meeting the Prime Minister's arbitrary target, Mr Blunkett's every announcement fuels unease and mistrust.
In a world of shadowy enemies, imprecise intelligence and regular atrocities, fostering solidarity between different communities, cultures and faiths must be a priority for democratic governments. When fanatics practise summary revenge, it is crucial for the Home Secretary to uphold justice, due process and the rule of law. Mr Blunkett's recent interventions have been anything but measured. If the Government wants a 'big conversation' with the nation, the Home Secretary should stop shouting and join in.
