![]()
| Have we got the balance right yet?The Big Issue: drug reform Drugs Uncovered - Observer special Sunday April 28, 2002 The Observer Your magazine on drugs (Drugs Uncovered, last week) was excellent, but you missed an important part of the drugs debate - prison. From 1996-2000, the British taxpayer paid £36 million for additional sentences given to prisoners who tested positive for drugs. According to the Howard League for Penal Reform, most positive results were for cannabis. One can only imagine the pain of prisoners given a prison sentence as punishment for cannabis possession when, on the other side of the wall, smoking a joint is all but legal. Steve Taylor Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire The National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse (NTA) welcomes the development of a mature discussion about drugs. But let us not get distracted. Regardless of whether certain drugs are reclassified or not, people will still use drugs - and some will develop significant problems that impact on the users themselves, their friends and families, and the wider community. The most effective and efficient way of dealing with this is through treatment. The Government has recognised this. Funding for drug treatment in England has increased by 35 per cent this year alone and, for the first time, a national agency has been established to improve treatment. The NTA aims to at least double the number of people in treatment - from 100,000 in 1998 to 200,000 in 2008. This summer, we will launch a framework for care that emphasises the need to co-ordinate treatment with housing, employment and other services. The NTA is also launching major campaigns to: develop and recruit more drug treatment workers; reduce waiting times; and increase services for under-represented groups. But there is no point in having more treatment if it is not effective. The NTA will monitor services, co-ordinate research and share information on what works with treatment providers.
You say in your leader last week '...medical evidence and experience alike are united in the view that heroin and crack cocaine have powerful addictive qualities and are physically and mentally destructive'. While both are highly addictive, the physical and mental destructiveness of pharmaceutically pure heroin is doubtful, though the additives the suppliers include have certainly claimed a number of casualties. It appears people can live productive if somewhat constipated lives on pure smack. There's a class of drugs that results in far more deaths than heroin: Home Office figures show they led to 3,433 deaths as opposed to 265 for heroin, morphine and opiates combined. Withdrawal is far longer, and often considered harder. Yet you don't even mention them. These drugs are tranquillisers. Drugs Uncovered: Observer special Drugs Uncovered News and comment Revealed: Britain's drug habit Leader: Time to be adult about drugs Exclusive Drugs Uncovered poll 21.04.2002: The poll: What you take ... and what you think Introduction 21.04.2002: Mark Kohn: Boom or bust? The knowledge 21.04.2002: The lowdown, drug by drug 21.04.2002: 100 years of altered states 21.04.2002: How much do children know? 21.04.2002: Tales of experience Street market 21.04.2002: Drugstore Britain 21.04.2002: In the lab: What's in the drugs? 21.04.2002: My drugs 21.04.2002: Sylvia Patterson: Cocaine nation Staying clean 21.04.2002: Martin Bright: can you kick addiction? Class A capitalists 21.04.2002: Faisal Islam: who reaps the profits? 21.04.2002: Tony Thompson: Deadly cargo The future? 21.04.2002: Andrew Smith: Can drugs make you smarter? 21.04.2002: The next Big High? Drugs policy debate Rowena Young: What do we do when the drugs war stops? Blair 'must scrap failed drug tactics' 03.03.2002: Mary Riddell: The private hell of a very public death Cristina Odone: Don't legalise drugs 25.11.2001: Arnold Kemp: Prohibition should be banned Henry McDonald: Legalise drugs, but tax them too 22.07.2001: The drugs debate: where next? 20.01.2002: Viv Evans: Why Eton's drug policy is wrong Toby Young: Fed up with media cant about cocaine Euan Ferguson: But there's only one problem. I hate dope Andrew Rawnsley: New Labour is for U-turning Britain's hard drugs epidemic: Observer investigation 15.07.2001: David Rose: Our society is hooked - here's how to fix it David Rose: Opium of the people New epidemic fear Epidemic fear as 'hillbilly heroin' hits the streets Oxycodone explained The drugs debate: Observer investigation The Dutch lesson: No drugs war, but pragmatism works Brixton experiment: "The dealers think they're untouchable now..." More from Guardian Unlimited Special report: drugs in Britain The changing drugs debate Focus: How smears brought top gay cop to brink of ruin Drug video's shock tactics 'won't work' Drug laws revolution set for UK Crack 'epidemic' fuels rise in violent crime Dutch model for UK drug laws Police urge major rethink on heroin The police and hard drugs: the Cleveland report 20.01.2002: Focus: ecstasy after-effects that could last a lifetime | ||||||||||||||||||